Idolatrous lust

Typhoon Yolanda and other calamities are caused by idolatrous lust. But what's going on between the author of idolatry and the legalizer of lust because it seems they are not in good terms? 

This was shown in the pronouncement of Lipa Archbishop Ramon Arguelles, who blamed the "ungodly" laws, e.g, Reproductive Health (RH) law, as
a cause of Philippine disasters. Is he honestly correct?

First premise: The subject of the blame are the recent Philippine calamities, such as, Cebu-Bohol earthquake and Yolanda typhoon last October 15, 2013 and November 8, 2013, respectively.

Second premise: Reproductive Health Law was approved only last December 2012.

Third premise: "Lust" is being promoted in the reproductive health law.

Fourth premise: When Bohol-Cebu earthquake struck, alleged churches in Cebu City and Bohol were destroyed, consisting of 10 historic Roman Catholic Buildings. Some of the Roman Catholic idols were still standing but were not able to protect the Roman Catholic buildings.  

Fifth premise: Calamities in the Philippines had been happening even before reproductive health was discussed in the Philippine Congress.
 

Sixth premise: Alleged Church had been in the Philippines since 1521.

Based on the above facts and circumstances, who will have a better argument? The "lust" argument which is related to "oral sex" or the idolatry argument?

Kindly refer to "oral sex theory" to fully comprehend.

Related articles:

• Lipa archbishop: 'Ungodly' laws cause disasters (ABS-CBNnews.com)
• A Poem on His Coming (wordatthenet.com)
• Spiritual Stress: Thing to Reckon (wordatthenet.com)
• Idolatry: Cause of Spiritual Stress (wordatthenet.com)
• The Oral Sex Theory (wordatthenet.com)
• Habakkuk 2 and the End Times (wordatthenet.com)

For detailed discussions, click to Religious Deception and Morality Deception eBooks at WORDatTheNet.