Immorality in Book of Genesis

The term immorality or lust known today as "oral sex", "same-sex marriage", "eating uncooked meat", sodomy, reproductive health law, etc, has its origin from Genesis verses. 

But due to blood-oriented teachings of preachers, the substance and spirit of the words written in the verses were contaminated leading to deception. 

The succeeding series of articles will specifically touch on specific verses and how their meaning lost through generation and how immorality was induced by Vatican City, in addition to idolatry. The participation of United States through "same-sex marriage" shall also be discussed, including the Philippine reproductive health law and its repercussions.

 
To forewarn, the author will be very thankful if nothing significant will happen this coming April 2014. He has his basis but will be affirmed only on that time. When the author says April 2014, he is referring to a month and year, not hours or days.

In this introductory topic, immorality will be touched by starting with Genesis verses on "eating meat with blood still in it".

1God blessed Noah and his sons and said: "Have many children, so that your descendants will live all over the earth. 2All the animals, birds and fish will live in fear of you. They are all placed under your power. 3Now you can eat them, as well as green plants; I give them all to you for food. 4The one thing you must not eat is meat with blood still in it. I forbid this because the life is in the blood. 5If anyone takes human life, he will be punished. I will punish with death any animal that takes a human life. 6Human beings were made like God, so whoever murders one of them will be killed by someone else.7You must have many children, so that your descendants will live all over the earth." (Genesis 9:1-7,TEV)

Before discussing fully the issue, let us believe in good faith that the translation of the "Word" from its ancient language to the present version is correct and that the translation takes into full consideration the sequence on how the "words" were spoken, specifically on the above cited verses. Having done so, then let us proceed.

Studying the verses, the following elements are noted:

1. General statement- Taking a human life is punishable. (Verses 5 and 6).
2. If the one taking a human life is an animal, God will punish the animal with death. (Verse 5)
3. If the one taking is a human being, then God permitted other human being to kill him. (Verse 6)
4. There is distinction on the procedure of punishment between human beings and animals. (Verse 5 and 6)
5. Human beings are superior to animals.(Verse 2)
6. Human beings are permitted to eat animals. (Verse 3)
7. There is no prohibition whatsoever on killing of animals. (Verses 1-7)
8. The statements were spoken to human beings not to animals. (Verse 1)
9. There is no specification what "meat with blood still in it" is prohibited to be eaten-either the meat of a human being or animal, (Verse 4)
10. The verses are opened and closed with "procreation" statements. (Verse 1 and Verse 7)

The critical questions: Are the verses consistently referring only to human life? Specifically, is the term "life" stated in verse 4 refers only to human life, instead of "animal life"? What is the significance of knowing the operational definition of "life" in verse 4? Next issue is determination of word "life".

If interested in final discussion, click to The Oral Sex Theory to have a comprehensive understanding.