Procreation and immorality verse

Genesis 9:1 and 9:7 are procreation statements which enclosed the prohibited meat verse in Genesis 9:4 or the immorality verse. Logically, will they be of help in correcting immorality deception by way of understanding the kind of meat that is being prohibited? To illustrate the procreation statements for animals and human beings, quoted are the scriptural passages, as follows:

Deception in Life

In the previous article entitled Immorality in Book of Genesis, a question was asked on whether or not the word "life" in Genesis 9:4 refers only to "human" life to the exclusion of "animal" life. Is there a deception?

Life is presently understood to include animal life, which is also reinforced by science. Because of this orientation, most believers consider the forbidden  "meat with blood still in it" as referring only to "any" animal meat to the doctrinal exclusion of human meat because preachers  believe that nobody will eat "human meat", even if "human blood" is no longer on it. 

For reference, the verse is restated, to wit;

4The one thing you must not eat is meat with blood still in it. I forbid this because the life is in the blood.(Genesis 9:4, TEV)

Immorality in Book of Genesis

The term immorality or lust known today as "oral sex", "same-sex marriage", "eating uncooked meat", sodomy, reproductive health law, etc, has its origin from Genesis verses. 

But due to blood-oriented teachings of preachers, the substance and spirit of the words written in the verses were contaminated leading to deception. 

The succeeding series of articles will specifically touch on specific verses and how their meaning lost through generation and how immorality was induced by Vatican City, in addition to idolatry. The participation of United States through "same-sex marriage" shall also be discussed, including the Philippine reproductive health law and its repercussions.

 
To forewarn, the author will be very thankful if nothing significant will happen this coming April 2014. He has his basis but will be affirmed only on that time. When the author says April 2014, he is referring to a month and year, not hours or days.

Deception in money immorality

Before you look at others, look first at yourself. Before you attack others for immorality, see to it that you are not immoral. Othewise, deception would be suspected. 

When Pope Francis attacked the "trickle-down" theories on economics, the above basic teaching comes into fore. 

Because, if analyzed carefully, he totally lacks any legal personality to object to it based on his alleged justifiable and moral grounds.Nor  has the rights to utter words against "money", any person or anything in heaven, on earth and underneath the sea.

Above proposition is logical, unless, he attacks first the "holy" cross, "holy" rosary, rosary beads and strings, and every Roman Catholic idols, e.g images and statues, which are being promoted by Roman Catholic Alleged Church.

He should also return first the title of the "Holy Father" to the real owner, including all the donations, monetary or proprietary, and all the "moneys" that the Roman Catholic alleged church had benefited in selling deceptive images, statues and candles, etc and all the fees paid for baptisms, masses, weddings, burials, etc, to all deceived followers.