Faith Deception?

Faith of ostriches

When Pope Francis warns against “administering a vaccine against faith”, what does he mean when he said the word 'faith'? Because, obviously, when he mentioned ‘vaccine against faith, definitely, he is referring to “faith” as a disease, because vaccines are only intended to prevent diseases.

But when he further warned against ‘administering’ the vaccine, then he logically meant that he is warning against the prevention of a disease. 

Preachers' deception on "meat eating"

Is society being deceived by "no meat eating", "no blood transfusion", "no eating meat with blood still in it" doctrines of "blood-oriented" preachers? 

Are these preachers swaying the society to erroneously believe on nutritional prohibition to the exclusion of moral prohibition in "eating meat with blood still in it"? 

My personal answer is yes. Also, it is logical to believe that these preachers are conspirators of sex perverts. These are based on the following premises:

First premise- the reason for prohibiting "eating meat with blood still in it" is because "life is in the blood" and not because "blood is life" or because of "blood" in meat.

Second premise-if you take out "life" in blood, you consequently take out the prohibition. In  other words, if you "eat meat with blood still in it" with no more life in  blood in meat, then the reason is no longer present, hence, no longer within the prohibition.

Deception in Life

In the previous article entitled Immorality in Book of Genesis, a question was asked on whether or not the word "life" in Genesis 9:4 refers only to "human" life to the exclusion of "animal" life. Is there a deception?

Life is presently understood to include animal life, which is also reinforced by science. Because of this orientation, most believers consider the forbidden  "meat with blood still in it" as referring only to "any" animal meat to the doctrinal exclusion of human meat because preachers  believe that nobody will eat "human meat", even if "human blood" is no longer on it. 

For reference, the verse is restated, to wit;

4The one thing you must not eat is meat with blood still in it. I forbid this because the life is in the blood.(Genesis 9:4, TEV)

Deception in money immorality

Before you look at others, look first at yourself. Before you attack others for immorality, see to it that you are not immoral. Othewise, deception would be suspected. 

When Pope Francis attacked the "trickle-down" theories on economics, the above basic teaching comes into fore. 

Because, if analyzed carefully, he totally lacks any legal personality to object to it based on his alleged justifiable and moral grounds.Nor  has the rights to utter words against "money", any person or anything in heaven, on earth and underneath the sea.

Above proposition is logical, unless, he attacks first the "holy" cross, "holy" rosary, rosary beads and strings, and every Roman Catholic idols, e.g images and statues, which are being promoted by Roman Catholic Alleged Church.

He should also return first the title of the "Holy Father" to the real owner, including all the donations, monetary or proprietary, and all the "moneys" that the Roman Catholic alleged church had benefited in selling deceptive images, statues and candles, etc and all the fees paid for baptisms, masses, weddings, burials, etc, to all deceived followers.

Idolatrous lust in Filipinos?

Before engaging in issues between two opposing forces related to causes of Philippine calamities, it is necessary to consider the possibility of deceptions among the parties.

For example, in a recent pronouncement of Lipa Archbishop Ramon Arguelles, he blames the "ungodly" laws, e.g, Reproductive Health (RH) law, as a cause of Philippine disasters.

Is he honestly correct?

First premise: The subject of the blame are the recent Philippine calamities, such as, Cebu-Bohol earthquake and Yolanda typhoon last October 15, 2013 and November 8, 2013, respectively.

Second premise: Reproductive Health Law was approved only last December 2012.

Third premise: "Lust" is being promoted in the reproductive health law.